On Sunday, July 5, 2020 11:31:41 AM MST Solomon Peachy wrote: > On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 10:20:01AM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > Chromebook devices are neither UEFI nor BIOS. You can use GPT disk layout > > while still booting BIOS, which they also don't do. Chromebook devices > > either boot with uboot -> depthcharge or Coreboot -> uboot -> > > depthcharge. I don't see how this helps your argument. > > If one adds ChromeOS devices into the numbers I posted, then the > proportion of BIOS-boot-capable, BIOS-boot-enabled, and/or BIOS-only > devices on the market (and their portion of the total install base) goes > down, not up. > > So using the absense of chromebooks in the numbers I referenced actually > boosts, rather than undermines, my argument. Oh, there were supposedly > 17 million chromebooks shipped in 2019, versus 261 million "PCs" and > 12-ish million "servers". > > ...Is this horse sufficiently dead yet? > > - Solomon Actually, Coreboot has a SeaBIOS payload as well, so the x86_64 Chromebooks are "BIOS-boot-capable" systems. (Coreboot also has a GRUB payload, which is used by early Purism devices, before they switched to SeaBIOS, and is used by all x86_64 Libreboot systems). People are still using systems from before 2019. More importantly, people are still using systems from 2010-2012 in Fedora, as demonstrated by this thread. -- John M. Harris, Jr. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
