On Do, 02.07.20 12:46, Peter Robinson (pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 12:19 AM Jóhann B. Guðmundsson > <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 30.6.2020 22:38, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > >> sd-boot is already installed on end users system, is light weight > > >> compared to Grub ( sd-boot only supports uefi,smaller code size, easier > > >> to maintain ). > > > And that is exactly the problem, systemd-boot has only a small fraction of > > > the feature set of GRUB. That is what makes it so small. I do not see what > > > value it would provide over GRUB-EFI. > > > > > > In addition, as far as I know, systemd-boot is not compatible with the > > > "Secure Boot" shim. > > > > > > sd-boot works fine with secure boot but good point I'll add a test case > > for that and check if it's not working. > > Is that with self enrolled keys or is it now signed with the MS keys > through the official process? It's up to the distro to sign it, it supports the shim though. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
