Re: Bodhi too eager to push updates to stable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 08:18:27PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 06:10:23PM -0000, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> > Isn't this how bodhi always worked? One week (two weeks for EPEL) and
> > if doesn't get negative karma, it gets pushed - no matter if it's an
> > enhancement, or a bugfix, or a security update.
> 
>   I don't think so. I remember my updates sitting in testing for weeks.
> Not that I find it worrisome. If my package is so niche that no one tests
> it, then no one will be impacted if the update is now or month later.

Just a sidenote, but do note that doesn't mean no one has tested it. 
We don't know if anyone tested it or not, but there are definitely folks
who run with updates-testing enabled and just report negative karma on
things that break but ignore other updates.

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux