Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Fedora-Retired-Packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 16. 06. 20 v 0:40 Ian McInerney napsal(a):
> and then cleaned them off manually (listing them through `rpm -qa | grep fcXX` and then manually removing them), but I
> think it would be better to warn on upgrade when those packages don't exist in the newer release to tell the user they
> aren't around. Then they can make the decision on what to do with them.

This is what actually `fedora-upgrade(8)` does at the end of upgrade. The problem is that every release, we have some
fail-to-build package in the compose and the new release contains the package from the previous release. But they should
not be removed. E.g., In Fedora 32 is js-html5shiv.fc31

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/js-html5shiv/tree/master
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=26061

-- 
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux