Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Fedora-Retired-Packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 16. 06. 20 v 0:37 James Cassell napsal(a):
> Please not using mechanism. Make it easy to opt out, or better yet opt-in.

On package level, there is likely no other way. DNF team will have no time/resources to implement this on DNF level.
I can only thing of /usr/sbin/remove-retired-package which would be a wrapper for
  dnf remove $list $of $retired $package
Does that sounds better?

Is there some way how to get this information from PDC?

> Probably better to just advertise `yum list extras` which has existed since at least Fedora 12.

Will be my mom able to write something like:
 dnf remove $(dnf list extras | awk '{print $1} | grep -v "package-I-still-want")
?
On my system this prints 124 package. Half of them are from 3rd party repositories or from command line and I want to
preserver them. So I even cannot use the command above. And it is easier to remove them one by one. This is painful.

-- 
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux