Re: Lots of FailsToInstall on rawhide bugs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/30/20 12:46 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Folks -

   I'm afraid the new FailsToInstall bugs may be a bit much for me. Often it seems:

- There is already a FTBFS bug against the package which is the root cause of the FTI. - There was a soname bump in rawide and the builds didn't manage to complete before the next rawhide compose.  I know, people probably should be using side tags, but it's the maintainers of the dependent packages that are being harassed.  And can't we even have a bit more than a day to address these.

For released branches, sure go for it (although I would still argue about checking for a FTBFS bug first).  But can we back off a little bit on rawhide?

- Orion

I will however express thanks that the bugs are automatically closed when the packages can install.

--
Orion Poplawski
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems          720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office             FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                       orion@xxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301                 https://www.nwra.com/

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux