On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 1:47 PM Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Folks -
I'm afraid the new FailsToInstall bugs may be a bit much for me.
Often it seems:
- There is already a FTBFS bug against the package which is the root
cause of the FTI.
- There was a soname bump in rawide and the builds didn't manage to
complete before the next rawhide compose. I know, people probably
should be using side tags, but it's the maintainers of the dependent
packages that are being harassed. And can't we even have a bit more
than a day to address these.
For released branches, sure go for it (although I would still argue
about checking for a FTBFS bug first). But can we back off a little bit
on rawhide?
Agreed, even on released branches I had some buildroot overrides because I was actively working on update a package. I got a FTBFS bug, so I closed it as invalid. I got a new one filed in a day or two.
Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
