Re: late generation of assemble code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, May 28, 2020 9:41:54 PM MST Paul Dufresne via devel wrote:
> On 2020-05-28 7:36 a.m., Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:07 PM Jan Kratochvil
> > 
> > <jan.kratochvil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 24 May 2020 05:21:05 +0200, Paul Dufresne via devel wrote:
> >>> The idea was to push code generation as near as possible of code
> >>> execution.
> >>> Because at execution time, you know what are the specific features of
> >>> the
> >>> CPU, and what is used to most often by the user of the program.
> >> 
> >> In Free Software you have that already - it is called the source code.
> >> If you want host-specific optimizations use Gentoo Linux.
> > 
> > One could implement a DNF plugin that builds packages locally since we
> > have source RPM repositories.
> 
> Well... when I said code generation as near as possible of code
> execution... I did not want to start compiling from source code, which
> take way too long in my opinion. LLVM Intermediate Representation is a
> bit like compiled Java, or run-everywhere .NET exe, that are not yet
> generated code for a specific CPU. But unlike compiled Java or .Net
> intermediary language that are specific to one language or family of
> language, LLVM intermediate language is like a RISC assembler with
> unlimited registers (as far as I know). Also using some Single Static
> Assignment, like used in C compilers to make it easier to do
> transformations on the code. LLVM IR can be run with *"lli* directly
> executes programs in LLVM bitcode format. It takes a program in LLVM
> bitcode format and executes it using a just-in-time compiler or an
> interpreter."
> 
> But when I proposed that, I was not aware main developer had been hired
> by Apple. And like people have replied before, they don't like the Clang
> (C, C++ LLVM-based compiler) I guess in good part because of the more
> permissive license than GPL it use: Illinois/NCSA license.

Paul,

What benefit do you see in the overhead of LLVM IR, compared to standard 
packages?

-- 
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux