Fwd: Re: late generation of assemble code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



had forgotten to reply also to the list... doing it now:

[cut the part where it was suggested to make package that contains LLVM Intermediate Representation bitcode rather than CPU specific assembler]


On 2020-05-29 1:01 a.m., John M. Harris Jr wrote:
Paul,
What benefit do you see in the overhead of LLVM IR, compared to standard
packages?

John,

Where do you see overhead in the distribution of LLVM IR?

Advantages:

* more space on the hard disks of the servers, because they contains repositories only for LLVM IR packages rather than one by supported architectures

* less use of the CPU time of the servers because they don't optimize code for specific CPUs

* very reduced cost for supporting more architectures, as code is client-side generated

* faster code on clients with recent CPUs, because code is optimized for them, and was not in the old way of doing because you had to distribute for a common base CPU

* CPU specific code generation and optimizations can be done on idle time of the clients... there is not much idle time of the servers


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux