Re: Modularity survey - results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:56:35 AM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 19. 05. 20 16:46, Christopher wrote:
> 
> > Interesting that the survey shows that the most common response was that
> > people  use it "not at all" and the overall response was negative, but
> > the reaction to that is, "improve the docs" and "works as intended". Am I
> > the only one who thinks that the people pushing modularity aren't
> > listening to the larger community?
> FWIW I understand the action point for this survey as a way to improve the 
> situation for environments where we are "stuck with modularity" (such as
> RHEL and EPEL 8) rather than a call for action that says "if we fix this,
> we'll proceed with Fedora modularization".
> 
> -- 
> Miro Hrončok
> --
> Phone: +420777974800
> IRC: mhroncok

Based on the conclusions section, where it talks only of Fedora releases as 
goal dates, I can't see that as being the case.


-- 
John M. Harris, Jr.


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux