Re: gnome-vfs not in Rawhide?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le jeudi 07 avril 2005 Ã 10:52 -0500, Chris Adams a Ãcrit :
> Once upon a time, John Thacker <thacker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> > I'm biased; my feelings for some time have been "Die, XMMS, Die!"  I like
> > their playlist-based approach much better than Rhythmbox, but their
> > refusal to move away from gtk+ is frustrating.  I get along perfectly
> > well without gtk+, and don't like installing it for just one program.
> 
> Users don't care about the libraries though; it's all about the apps.

Believe me, when using an old lib like gtk+ that directly translates
into "you will only use acsii, else" they _do_ care about the lib
factor.

I still remember the lengths people went to to get a fontconfig-enabled
moz build back when fontconfig was new. And it was "just a library" too.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux