Re: i3 new SIG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Eduard,

On 5/15/20 12:21 AM, Eduard Lucena wrote:
> 
>     As others have already mentioned in the thread: we should look into
>     joining forces with the sway SIG (which I am also a member of).
> 
> 
> It's not a bad idea, but TBH, I still want to stay away from Wayland.
> 
>     While a lot of the packages of interest are not really shared, the
>     general
>     similarity would allow us to save a lot of time when it comes to QA and
>     the creation of a spin. Maybe we should merge into the tilling window
>     manager SIG? (with a better name of course).
> 
> 
> Well, we can join effort for packaging but produce different Spins, why
> not? wdyt?
>  

It's nice to see more interest in i3! But I'm not sure that joining
efforts is such a good idea. While sway and i3 may be very similar from
a user perspective, they are not from a packager's perspective. Also,
while you don't really care about sway, I don't have much interest in
i3. So what exactly would a joined SIG do? All the work would be either
towards i3 or sway, I don't see any synergetic effects of a joint SIG.

Kind regards,
Till
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux