Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08. 05. 20 16:55, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Fri, 8 May 2020, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:

Not that it's a huge deal for me but I wouldn't call the upgrade smooth.

There were a bunch of python2 packages that needed to be removed which
necessitated --allowerasing which I've never had to do before.

This should not be the case. If you have any such packages, please always
report it as a bug against fedora-obsolete-packages. This should be done
even after GA, since we can always fix the upgrade path for people who didn't
upgrade immediately.

Speaking of fedora-obsolete-packages, that package got removed from my system on upgrade from F31->F32.  Is that expected?

Yes. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827398

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux