Le lundi 13 avril 2020 à 13:34 -0400, Matthew Miller a écrit : > On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 01:30:57PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > That is another major concern, that decisions made by Fedora for > > Fedora > > users depend more and more on input from people (and companies) who > > are NOT > > Fedora users. What makes sense for RHEL and/or CentOS does not > > necessarily > > make sense for Fedora (and for that matter, what makes sense for > > RHEL also > > does not necessarily make sense for CentOS). Fedora decisions > > should depend > > ONLY on the input and needs of Fedora users. > > Fedora has huge impact beyond our immediate userbase because we are > the upstream for RHEL, CentOS, and their further derivatives. > > Take a look https://imgur.com/a/58OXYve. This is Fedora EPEL (which > is part of our project!), not the downstreams themselves, but shows > just *one* aspect of that impact. Another way to see things is that Fedora has a huge impact precisely because Fedora decicions are depening ONLY on the input and needs of Fedora users, and Fedora users have been consistently refusing the short-termist non future-proof self-defeating shortcuts that plague some of Fedora’s downstreams. Fedora takes the long view. Over a significant span of time, that produces better results than quick hacks. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
