On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:06 AM Nils Philippsen <nils@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 13:58 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 14. 04. 20 13:39, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> > > So, to make this more robust against problems like you described,
> > > we
> > > should decouple what's run in the build root from a specific minor
> > > version of Python and the rpm Python package (and remove the
> > > superfluous Koji dependency). This shouldn't be much work, the
> > > biggest
> > > piece is probably to make it get by without using the rpm Python
> > > package (for comparing EVRs and to expand macros), but a tiny
> > > ctypes
> > > wrapper around rpmlib should solve this for us.
> >
> > Or even running `rpmdev-vercmp` and `rpm --eval` with subprocess:
>
> I'd rather not pull in rpmdevtools -- which depends on Perl and a
> couple 3rd party Perl packages. ;)
>
> One thing I missed in my previous mail was that we already shell out to
> rpmspec ("rpm --specfile ...") to query the epoch/version of the spec
> file, but that should be okay, too -- it's part of rpm-build which we
> need for building the SRPM at that point anyway.
>
For what its worth, I want to get rid of the Perl dependency. I just
have to decide which Python reimplementation of spectool to put in
there... :)
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
