On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 05:43:36PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 09. 04. 20 15:43, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > We have written some documentation on how `rpmautospec` works and how you > > can opt in at:https://docs.pagure.org/Fedora-Infra.rpmautospec/ > > Thanks for working on this \o/ > > I will definitively try this out soon. > > > Here is one important concern I have before I dive in. > > From the docs: > > https://docs.pagure.org/Fedora-Infra.rpmautospec/principle.html > > The plugin then installs and calls rpmautospec in the chroot. > > https://docs.pagure.org/Fedora-Infra.rpmautospec/install.html > > The Koji plugin rpmautospec_builder is meant to be installed on all the Koji > > builders running the buildSRPMFromSCM task > > I suppose this means the "koji-builder-plugin-rpmautospec" is installed on > the Koji builder and "rpmautospec" package is installed inside the mock > chroot of the buildSRPMFromSCM task, right? > > I've looked at your stg Koji builds: > https://koji.stg.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?owner=pingou&state=all > > homebank seem to use rpmautospec: > https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/rpms/homebank/blob/master/f/homebank.spec > > The buildSRPMFromSCM task root.log has: > > ================================================================================ > Package Arch Version Repo Size > ================================================================================ > Installing: > rpmautospec noarch 0.1.2-1.fc33 build 8.8 k > Installing dependencies: ... > python3 aarch64 3.8.1-1.fc32 build 31 k ... > I am not entirely sure if the buildSRPMFromSCM task in a side tag is using > that side tag's builds for itself, but if it does, my specific concern is > that the entire stack of packages rpmautospec depends on has a runtime > dependency on python(abi) = 3.8, so when we'll start bootstrapping Python > 3.9 in a side tag, the plugin won't be installable yet, hence every "Python > package" (including the Python interpreter) in the dep chain of > "rpmautospec" might not be able to use this. > > Is my conclusion correct? I actually cannot comment on this, it may be worth opening a koji ticket to ask if this is the case or not and if it is if they can think of a way to deal with this. Random thought: Could both python versions be made available in the side-tag? On the bright, I take your questions as you'd be interested in using this ;-) Pierre _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
