> Honestly, degraded performance is an expected result of doing component > build, so I would say that's just not a bug at all, it's just how > Chromium works. Our hand is forced here by upstream's strange and > unusual packaging decisions. Other distros do it this way too. > > But you say the difference is *noticeable*, i.e. noticeable to users > when not doing benchmarks? That sounds weird. > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 9:56 am, Tom Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > This is my dilemma. (It is not my only dilemma, nor my most pressing, > > but it is still mine.) That said, I would love to get input from > > other smart Fedorans as to what I should do here. > > Naive proposal: chromium-freeworld could completely rebuild Chromium > and Obsoletes the entire Fedora package? It could have an epoch ahead > of the Fedora package such that the rpmfusion version is always > preferred even if the Fedora package updates a bit? Then > chromium-libs-media-freeworld can go away and the main Fedora package > can do a static build and you get working krb5. Is there a downside to > this approach that I'm missing? People that want the Fedora version of the build, even without the extra bits, would get rpmfusion if they happen to have rpmfusion enabled for another reason. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
