On 06. 04. 20 17:20, Leigh Griffin wrote:
I'm reaffirming that I hear the concerns and that my team are taking them on board. I am also reaffirming that our engagement point is with the Fedora Council, not at the individual level as the Council is responsible for listening and collating those concerns and speaking on behalf of the entire community.
This only makes it more clear that you are not interested in engaging with the community directly, but you are deferring that to the Council. This is not "the process", this is just a way to justify not engaging. What you say here is not very friendly.
It is not for me to change how that process works so please reach out to your Council reps and engage through that channel.
Fedora has an established process for infra changes like this and you have chosen to bypass it entirely by talking directly to the Council. And now you say "this is how this process works" -- well, in fact it isn't.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/program_management/changes_policy/ https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/292#comment-640101 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
