Re: v4l2loopback kernel module in Fedora?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 4:45 PM Iñaki Ucar <iucar(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:

> I don't know enough about RPMFusion packaging. I use RPMFusion, but
> haven't looked into the contribution process. In particular, I wonder
> if their modules are signed by a key that's already trusted in Fedora.
> My guess is not, and then it's the same problem as with COPR.
> 

We don't sign any kmods at rpmfusion, there were some attempts to add signing to akmods.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1454824

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux