Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 17:47 +0200, jkonecny@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> -- snip --
> > As for Pagure itself, I think this is where we fundamentally
> > disagree.
> > I think it behooves us to own and provide an experience tailored for
> > our community from beginning to end. That's why we have Koji, Bodhi,
> > Dist-Git, and many other tools in that part of the lifecycle. The
> > packager experience is literally the lifeblood of the project, and
> > our
> > contributors are the core of what makes Fedora successful. Pagure
> > gives us an opportunity to do right by them that I *really* don't
> > think we can do with any alternatives.
> > 
> > That does *not* mean that CPE team should be the sole owner of the
> > Pagure *codebase*. On that point, I agree. And that's why I've spent
> > a
> > lot of time and energy since late 2018 working on building up that
> > community. It's finally starting to bear fruit too: there's at least
> > one entity interested in building a product around it and
> > contributing
> > to help support that product, there's the FSF preparing to launch a
> > new forge using Pagure, there's the Trisquel GNU+Linux distribution
> > working on a Pagure deployment to host their code and packaging, and
> > there's a few other things I've got up my sleeve to help broaden the
> > community with not just users, but also contributors.
> 
> It's great to hear this. Thanks a lot Neal for trying to find
> consumers. I'm not sure if this information was available to Fedora
> infrastructure during the decision. It means that we may have another
> contributors.

I specifically mentioned at least the FSF angle on this mailing list,
over a month ago:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/EJAKU3MO4T5ZEWEBUWIRSGBWTFQU44QK/

so at least that part certainly *should* have been, if we assume it's
reasonable to expect those making this decision to be paying attention
to this list.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux