On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:56 AM Leigh Griffin <lgriffin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > We haven't ironed out the full details but what was incredibly clear to us was that Gitlab was the decision to make. The next step in getting there is what we are engaging in now to get thoughts and suggestions and expect several threads in that capacity from a technical perspective in the coming weeks and months. It is not incredibly clear to the respondents on devel@. I don't care to imagine what stronger disagreement on this particular point looks like. On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 4:27 AM Iñaki Ucar <iucar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I was referring to, and I was expecting, an open conversation about > the User Story list, an open analysis of the requirements list. In > other words: > > 1. Open conversation to gather requirements. Done. > 2. Publication of User Story list. > 3. Open conversation to discuss (2). > 4. Publication of the final decision. > > I was expecting (3), and it's missing. I concur, and don't think the missing piece has been adequately addressed. There's a reason why there's bewilderment at the decision, it's not ignorable. Were there deliberations by CPE Team in between (2) and (4)? Is there a record of those deliberations? -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx