Re: Nvidia binary drivers fail to install on Fedora 32

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> I don't maintain an kmods, but from what I observe in the package
> commits, they break with each new Fedora kernel release and the
> maintenance burden is even higher for older nVidia driver versions.
>
> You're welcome to help with automation, but I'm afraid hunting for
> patches or writing them yourself will be a constant manual job in this
> case.

Well, if the kmod breaks, the akmod almost certainly breaks too, the same 
way, you just don't notice it (at least until the end user bug reports start 
coming in). That is another reason why the akmod approach is flawed.

So, sure, there is work that cannot be automated, but that is exactly the 
part of the work that has to be done for akmods as well, and an automated 
kmod build process would automatically alert you as soon as the kernel gets 
released. (Ideally, as soon as it gets built in Fedora Koji, or at least as 
soon as it hits updates-testing, whereas most users will only notice the 
akmod breaking after it hits the stable updates.)

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux