Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 09:05:27PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Monday, February 10, 2020 12:03:25 PM MST Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > "John M. Harris Jr" <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > On Saturday, January 25, 2020 2:52:05 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> > >> Question and (pre)proposal:
> > >> 
> > >> Can Fedora converge on a single swap-on-ZRAM implementation, and if
> > >> so, which one? Fedora Workstation WG wants to move to swap-on-ZRAM by
> > >> default in Fedora 33, and the working group needs to pick something
> > >> soon.
> > > 
> > > Using swap on zram disables the ability to hibernate, making it a
> > > non-starter for many users. If this is going to be thrown into
> > > anything, the user needs to be asked whether they want it or not in
> > > the installer, otherwise you're just taking away features.
> > 
> > I thought you told me that the workstation group considers hibernation
> > unsupported?  (id:2368390.zU9c8gpsLA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > --Robbie
> 
> They do, but that doesn't negate the fact that it is actually supported (you 
> can hibernate your system), and using swap on zram outright breaks hibernation 
> (for obvious reasons).

This discussion is mixing up two different interpretations of meaning
of "supported".

  - Supported, as in, "this use case is in scope & is a release criteria"

vs

  - Supported, as in, "the functionality works from a technical POV"

Thus since hibernation is declared an unsupported use case, the fact that
it might happen to work from a technical POV is merely good fortune and is
not required to stay that way, even if some people might be using that now.

IOW, if swap-on-ZRAM benefits core supported use cases, then it can be
acceptable to break unsupported use cases even if the latter currently
work at a technical POV. Enabling this kind of trade off to be made is
precisely why it is beneficial to define the scope of a product for
what is supported vs unsupported.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux