Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"John M. Harris Jr" <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Saturday, January 25, 2020 2:52:05 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> Question and (pre)proposal:
>>
>> Can Fedora converge on a single swap-on-ZRAM implementation, and if
>> so, which one? Fedora Workstation WG wants to move to swap-on-ZRAM by
>> default in Fedora 33, and the working group needs to pick something
>> soon.
>
> Using swap on zram disables the ability to hibernate, making it a
> non-starter for many users. If this is going to be thrown into
> anything, the user needs to be asked whether they want it or not in
> the installer, otherwise you're just taking away features.

I thought you told me that the workstation group considers hibernation
unsupported?  (id:2368390.zU9c8gpsLA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)

Thanks,
--Robbie

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux