On Monday, February 10, 2020 12:03:25 PM MST Robbie Harwood wrote: > "John M. Harris Jr" <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > On Saturday, January 25, 2020 2:52:05 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > >> Question and (pre)proposal: > >> > >> Can Fedora converge on a single swap-on-ZRAM implementation, and if > >> so, which one? Fedora Workstation WG wants to move to swap-on-ZRAM by > >> default in Fedora 33, and the working group needs to pick something > >> soon. > > > > Using swap on zram disables the ability to hibernate, making it a > > non-starter for many users. If this is going to be thrown into > > anything, the user needs to be asked whether they want it or not in > > the installer, otherwise you're just taking away features. > > I thought you told me that the workstation group considers hibernation > unsupported? (id:2368390.zU9c8gpsLA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) > > Thanks, > --Robbie They do, but that doesn't negate the fact that it is actually supported (you can hibernate your system), and using swap on zram outright breaks hibernation (for obvious reasons). -- John M. Harris, Jr. Splentity _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
