> >> And any discussion of GitHub isn't going to involve self-hosted, it's > >> going to involve GitHub.com, which means we're talking about losing > >> more of our independence as a project. This is one of those things > >> that I'm not sure is a wise move. > > > > Well since we have a request for requirements: I propose requirements > > #1 and #2 are to be self-hosted and open source. I'm suspect the > > Fedora community would be outraged if we fail to meet either requirement. > > I second this. FOSS is what's allowed RedHat to succeed and it would > really suck to see Fedora switch to a closed source platform that's > owned by Microsoft... > > Also, as somebody who runs a self hosted pagure server I would really > hate to see pagure go away. I understand Pingou may not have the time > to work on the project as in the past but the torch should definitely be > passed to somebody else or the community to continue work on the project. It's open source now so what's stopping people/companies using it now from contributing rather than relying on Pingou? Similarly if it ceases to be a core piece of infrastructure for Fedora there's nothing stopping the pagure community to continue it's development. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
