On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 11:44:31AM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > Also said in the e-mail, if you think those packages need to be exempted from > > the process, we can deal with that to, however there must be a valid reason. I > > don't think "the maintainer didn't actually maintain their Fedora packages for > > almost 2 years because they have real stuff to do" is a valid reason, yet other > > FESCo members might disagree with that statement. > > Well the FTB from people pushing builds would be directly due to the > fact they're not on the ACL for the secure-boot, there is a handful of > packages like that. > > Well FESCo might agree that they want booting x86 images with > secure-boot so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ We (Fedora) may want to have secure boot, yet we don't have maintainer with enough spare time for it. Let's be adults and forgo secure boot. -- Tomasz Torcz There exists no separation between gods and men: tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx one blends softly casual into the other. — Frank Herbert _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
