Am 13.01.20 um 14:05 schrieb Vít Ondruch: > While I like the annotated tag proposal, I would really appreciate if > the first step was replacing the: (..:) > %changelog > > %include changelog > > ~~~ > > where the `changelog` file would be either available with the original > changelog content in repository or if it was not available, it would be > provided by build infra. The *provided by infra* is the most important > thing here. This IMO would allow us incrementally improve the situation. > > Then we could discuss how to provide the content of the `changelog` > file, while maintainers could still maintain old changelogs, or they > could split the changelog into separate `changelog` file and maintain it > there, or leave it for infrastructure (simple collecting git commits) or > using annotated tags. I like that proposal. As a volunteer packager with only a few packages this appproach is very easy to understand and I can opt out easily if I dislike the automation (I'd like not to maintain a changelog manually but I also don't want to have it auto-generated based on all commit messages). If we look at the modularity disaster I think we should first start with a very simple approach which is easy to understand but also provides an opt-out. Felix _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
