Tom Hughes <tom@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 07/01/2020 12:22, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> Dne 07. 01. 20 v 12:41 Tom Hughes napsal(a): >>> The thing is that no matter how much you can manage to automate the >>> creation of spec files for a given ecosystem, and I've never seen one >>> where the typical spec file doesn't need some manual tweaking, you >>> are still going to hit the fundamental problem that those specs then >>> need to be reviewed. >> >> I disagree. >> Especially with libraries - be it python, gems... it can be very well automated without the need for review. > > Well that depends on the reason for the review, doesn't it? > > Just to take a few things, how does automation check that the license > declared in the upstream metadata is correct? openSUSE actually has a bot for exactly this in the Open Build Service (it's not perfect of course, but it takes a good chunk of the legal review burden from humans): https://github.com/openSUSE/cavil. Iirc Neal has been trying to get it into Fedora.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
