On Tue, 2019-12-17 at 20:53 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > To me it is, in a weird way: I tend to view the presence of someone > > who's willing to actually *do* something as a proxy for there being > > others who care about it. For instance on the 32-bit x86 topic - if the > > x86 SIG had *worked* and we'd had one or two people who really cared > > about it show up to do the work, like we have for ARM or ppc64, I'd > > have been more inclined to believe there were more people out there who > > really needed to run Fedora on 32-bit x86. > > From my perspective, you are twisting reality. The 32-bit x86 sig never > had a chance, because it was clear to everybody involved, RHAT wanted to > kill it and because everybody @RH proactively worked against any attempt > to support it. Um. So those times I found bugs specific to 32-bit x86 and mailed the list about them, that was me proactively working against any attempt to support it? That's funny, that's not how it felt at the time. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
