Re: Allow comments and discussion even though an update was pushed to stable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Sat, Dec 7, 2019, 17:30 Mattia Verga via devel <
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Il 06/12/19 21:51, Johannes Lips ha scritto:
>> >> "Johannes Lips" <johannes.lips(a)gmail.com&gt; writes:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> We already have a tool for reporting issues and problems, and it's not
>> >> bodhi.  If there's a problem with an already pushed update, it needs to
>> >> be in bugzilla - where it's actually discoverable - not in bodhi, where
>> >> it will go nowhere.
>> > I am not intending to use bodhi as a bug tracker, but I would like to be
>> able to reference issues, which were introduced with an update and I don't
>> really see a lot of negative effects of this.
>> > I think it's a way to make issues in bugzilla more easily traceable,
>> since if an update is closely related with a new bug it is easier to just
>> look into bodhi first and see if the issue affected others as well. If by
>> chance the first reporter of a bug is too late in bodhi this connection is
>> simply lost.
>> > I don't see it as bodhi replacing bugzilla, but rather as an additional
>> entry point, when looking for known issues in close relation with a bug.
>> >
>> > Johannes
>> >
>> As a user, if I find a bug in a package I would look into Bugzilla. As a
>> packager, I would expect to receive bug against my packages in Bugzilla.
>>
>> In my opinion, allowing comments on already pushed updates would mean
>> that some users think that reporting bugs into Bodhi equals to reporting
>> bugs into Bugzilla... so as a user I would have to look into Bodhi AND
>> Bugzilla when I find regressions and as a packager I would have to deal
>> with BZ tickets AND Bodhi comments without BZ tickets.
>>
>> If you **really** want to re-open comments on stable updates, please add
>> a very big, red warning which states that the package maintainer may not
>> look at new comments and to open a new BZ ticket!
>>
>> Mattia
>>
>
> I'm curious about this. I do get email notifications for all changes
> and comments for all my own bodhi updates plus for every update that I
> commented on. Have you turned this off, or do you mean to say you're
> going to ignore bodhi emails?

It's really hard to justify reading bodhi emails at this point.  The
vast majority of bodhi emails that I receive are for automatic process
for rawhide - which I neither care about nor wanted in any way.

Thanks,
--Robbie

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux