Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sat, Dec 7, 2019, 17:30 Mattia Verga via devel < > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Il 06/12/19 21:51, Johannes Lips ha scritto: >> >> "Johannes Lips" <johannes.lips(a)gmail.com> writes: >> >> >> >> >> >> We already have a tool for reporting issues and problems, and it's not >> >> bodhi. If there's a problem with an already pushed update, it needs to >> >> be in bugzilla - where it's actually discoverable - not in bodhi, where >> >> it will go nowhere. >> > I am not intending to use bodhi as a bug tracker, but I would like to be >> able to reference issues, which were introduced with an update and I don't >> really see a lot of negative effects of this. >> > I think it's a way to make issues in bugzilla more easily traceable, >> since if an update is closely related with a new bug it is easier to just >> look into bodhi first and see if the issue affected others as well. If by >> chance the first reporter of a bug is too late in bodhi this connection is >> simply lost. >> > I don't see it as bodhi replacing bugzilla, but rather as an additional >> entry point, when looking for known issues in close relation with a bug. >> > >> > Johannes >> > >> As a user, if I find a bug in a package I would look into Bugzilla. As a >> packager, I would expect to receive bug against my packages in Bugzilla. >> >> In my opinion, allowing comments on already pushed updates would mean >> that some users think that reporting bugs into Bodhi equals to reporting >> bugs into Bugzilla... so as a user I would have to look into Bodhi AND >> Bugzilla when I find regressions and as a packager I would have to deal >> with BZ tickets AND Bodhi comments without BZ tickets. >> >> If you **really** want to re-open comments on stable updates, please add >> a very big, red warning which states that the package maintainer may not >> look at new comments and to open a new BZ ticket! >> >> Mattia >> > > I'm curious about this. I do get email notifications for all changes > and comments for all my own bodhi updates plus for every update that I > commented on. Have you turned this off, or do you mean to say you're > going to ignore bodhi emails? It's really hard to justify reading bodhi emails at this point. The vast majority of bodhi emails that I receive are for automatic process for rawhide - which I neither care about nor wanted in any way. Thanks, --Robbie
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
