Re: Announcing new anitya integration and de-orphaning process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 02:25:08PM +0000, Mat Booth wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 07:32, Igor Gnatenko <
> ignatenkobrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Because it is really hard to run two systems at the same time and keep
> them synced?
> 
> Then let me rephrase. IMO the replacement system shouldn't have been
> commissioned into production before it reached feature parity.

The problem was new features. The option was either to retire pkgdb and
move on, or implement new features in pkgdb at large development
time/cost. There were several things pkgdb couldn't handle, I can't
recall them all, but stream branches was a big one. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux