On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 09:16:26AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 13:13 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > I'm a bit concerned about the growing number of broken dependencies in > > fedora, which leads to non-installable (FTI) and un-buildable (FTBFS) > > packages. For rawhide [0], I see almost 400 source packages and almost > > 200 x86_64 packages with broken deps. Especially the number of source > > packages with broken dependencies has steadily been growing since 29. > > I'd say the main problem here is not a lack of an objective but a lack > of information. Back when the tooling still worked and we got a daily > email with a handy list of packages with broken deps, I and Kevin Fenzi > and others would regularly go through it and fix the ones we could fix, > occasionally we'd get down to zero, but we always kept on top of it to > some extent. Now there isn't a handy list any more, we just don't do > this as much because it's not as easy to find what needs fixing in the > first place. > > The most useful thing to do here would be to fix up the tooling so we > get a reliable daily report again. +1 It's much easier to fix things where there's a handy list of broken things. :) kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
