Le 2019-11-14 22:01, Stephen Gallagher a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 4:00 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 14. 11. 19 21:32, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>I proposed earlier around the major
> upgrade rebuilds (letting us set other modules as `buildrequires:` of
> `python: [ ]` for stream expansion) without actually having to build
> the complete python stack in the modules. That might be a really
> convenient strategy, honestly.
Convenient to achieve what exactly?
To achieve an easy way to deal with modular rebuilds for new Python 3
versions.
How is that different, exactly, from adding a
Provides: module(modulename)
for in-module packages
and letting packagers use a normal dep syntax like
(foo with module(modulename))
whenever they want to express they want the module version of a
particular dep?
Except for adding the opaque module object to the mix that obscures all
dependency chain checks?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mailhot
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
