Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 06:57:55PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> The package review becomes then a basic PR. We could leverage the tools we are
> >> working on for regular PRs.
> >> If the PR is approved, you get access granted to it.
> >> If the PR is denied, both repo are deleted.
> > This is an interesting idea.
> It is, but I am afraid that then we will have Foo, foo, FOO and fOo
> repositories and we won't be able to get rid of them for similar reasons
> we are not allowed to delete branches in current dist-git.
> 

Maybe we could have a namespace for unapproved ones, and move the repo if
approved?


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux