Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 03:17:33PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
>> With about six more emails about it, sure.  And another piece of
>> infrastructure that has to be up and bug-free.
>> 
>> Even the gating and bodhi emails today are rather a lot: I don't want to
>> be notified if everything worked correctly.
>
> Sorry for side-tracking this here. We've cut down on the number of
> emails bodhi sends for rawhide. If this is still too many please open
> a ticket so we can discuss and see if we find a consensus on this.

I appreciate that you have reduced them.  I would like that number to be
zero unless something has gone wrong - I imagine this is not something
there will be consensus around.

Thanks,
--Robbie

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux