Re: Proven packager help request: DCMTK (and dependent packages) require update in F29/F30

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 4:50 AM Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I do not know the details well enough to be able to decide which is the
better way here. Both should be doable in principle.

As the maintainer of OpenImageIO I agree with Kevin, I'm OK with either, but one thing I would ask upstream is why they bumped soname on a patch level version increase...

With my packages I would typically update all released Fedora versions for patch level updates, but I also frequently build the package myself and run abi-compliance-checker or fedabipkgdiff on it to make sure things like soname bumps don't sneak in...

Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux