Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > As written on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Philosophy > updates should aim to fix bugs and not to introduce features. And changing > ABI is discouraged unless avoided. Here, we have a library with only 6 packages using it, and the source-level API appears to be compatible, so I think a grouped update of all 7 packages (the library + the 6 dependent packages) may well make sense, depending on what the other changes are. But yes, backporting security fixes should always be considered, it would also get the fix out sooner than coordinating a grouped update. I do not know the details well enough to be able to decide which is the better way here. Both should be doable in principle. Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
