Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 11. 09. 19 11:14, Dave Love wrote: >> I'm puzzled why it needs re-reviewing when branches are maintained, > > Because it was only maintained in EPEL, not Fedora. I just don't understand why it would be OK for EPEL but not for Fedora, but no matter. (I don't remember ever being asked to take it over, though a notification may never have got through to me.) >> but anyhow is it possible just to maintain EPEL branches? > > Yes, it is. That was the intention you've stated when you requested > the package to be unorphaned. Why have you requested the f31 branch at > all? It is not needed. I misunderstood that it was needed. > I recommend you retire on f31 once again and only keep this in epel. Thanks. I'm rather inclined to do that with other things to avoid hassle. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
