Re: failing push for un-orphaned package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11. 09. 19 11:14, Dave Love wrote:
I'm puzzled why it needs re-reviewing when branches are maintained,

Because it was only maintained in EPEL, not Fedora. IF you want to maintian it in Fedora (but I assume you don't), it needs a re-review, because it was retired in Fedora 3 years ago.

but anyhow is it possible just to maintain EPEL branches?

Yes, it is. That was the intention you've stated when you requested the package to be unorphaned. Why have you requested the f31 branch at all? It is not needed.

I recommend you retire on f31 once again and only keep this in epel.


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux