On 9/9/19 3:35 PM, vvs vvs wrote: > So, you are insisting that Koji just doesn't work without any assistance? And that it's impossible to build a separate i686 repository without affecting all others? We used to build secondary architectures separately, using koji-shadow to chase the primary builds. This had plenty of problems of its own. You can read a bit below, and maybe others can provide more history. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/RedefiningSecondaryArchitectures https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/3BO5E2XZ2D7BHK7GQXZB5S37AQIUN6YP/#ZYYG7RP754ONDU4T7DVFQ5U6YAXWSH55 > And that you can't exclude that architecture for a specific package? You can, but if everyone gets free license to ignore i686, I think it won't be long before you find yourself without some key packages. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
