On Sun, 2019-09-08 at 20:35 -0700, John M. Harris Jr. wrote: > > Wait, what happened to x86 becoming a secondary architecture? You know, there > are vendors that still create and sell x86 systems today. That already happened several releases ago. But secondary arches failing blocks package builds in Fedora, and enough i686 package builds fail now that it's become a problem, and - as Neal points out - part of the deal with i686 being a secondary arch was that there would be an active SIG to take care of arch-specific problems, like there is for each of the *other* secondary arches. But that didn't really pan out: the x86 list has had 38 mails, ever, most of which are people asking for someone to look at an x86-specific problem and...no-one doing it. Some folks did attempt to help, but there really wasn't enough time+expertise there to make it viable. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
