Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday, September 7, 2019 11:44:59 AM MST Victor V. Shkamerda wrote:
> I totally agree with that view. Making such decisions without public
> discussion is not respecting user's freedom of choice. And this list
> doesn't count as a public discussion. Nobody will know about it outside a
> very closed circle. If you don't know exact numbers or reasons why people
> still use that architecture, then rushing to drastic measures just won't
> have enough rationale and will be viewed as a lack of care.
 
> The reasons to use 32-bit userland might be more than you think. There are
> different use scenarios besides browsing Internet or virtualization. There
> could be a high cost of upgrade (think about replacing many computers at
> once). There could be a unique peripheral equipment. There could be
> compatibility concerns. And there could be just not enough memory.
 
> OTOH, what could justify removing repository entirely? Why not make it an
> option which could be installed on demand? That would be better than leave
> everyone out on the cold. Is the cost to build it really that high? Safety
> could not be a reason in a tightly contained environment. Let users decide
> for themselves.
 
> There is no black and white distinction: multilib or i686 kernel. There are
> reasons why using x86_64 kernel with i686 userland might be a better
> option. Some older office computers were manufactured with 64-bit CPU but
> without support for more than 4 GB RAM. In such case using i686 userland on
> a x86_64 kernel provides much more free memory than using 64-bit userland.
> Such configuration is unsupported, but neither is i686. Giving users a
> choice is always better than decide for them behind their backs.
 
> And of course there is still an option to switch to another OS. Do I need to
> remind that Linux and Red Hat were not created just to replace some other
> OS, but to respect freedom of choice? What happened that this is not even
> mentioned in such discussions? Is this just business as usual?

Wait, what happened to x86 becoming a secondary architecture? You know, there 
are vendors that still create and sell x86 systems today.


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux