Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Freeze

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 6:26 AM Martin Kolman <mkolman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I would personally still find even 24:00 confusing & would really suggest something
> clearly inambigous, such as 23:45 UTC or similar - that should clear any doubt of which day
> the freeze is part of once and for all & yet again no actualy changes in the machinery are needed.

2400 is totally confusing, I'm only finding it used in military
contexts and even there it seems to be vernacular. I'd rather be
surprised if military police use it.

But anyway, I did laugh a bit out loud at 23:45 UTC because *of
course* there are many other totally unambiguous times to choose from
instead. Some of the best comedy is pointing out the obvious.

My suggestion would be, without respect to preference, 0015 UTC, 0030
UTC, or 0100 UTC. And that's only because it acts like a kind of grace
period for anyone used to 0000 UTC, not paying attention to this
thread, and maybe misses the next announcement.


-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux