Re: fedora-gpg-keys not updated yet again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

I could not find a safe way to upgrade also this time. I found update
F32 [1], but not corresponding F31 just adding new key. I am missing
update similar to [2], just for F31 that once was Rawhide. It should be
version 31-0.5

I found and reopened one old bug [3]. I do not think this is just second
time.

On 8/19/19 11:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> So, a few things to note:
> 
> * fedora-repos was updated for rawhide, however, unfortunately, It had
> two extra spaces on the first line... "  " which made gpg consider it
> invalid. This is likely the cause of any breakage with rawhide (mock,
> containers, copr, etc). This has been fixed in the newest fedora-repos
> package for f32/rawhide.
> 
> * There is no f31 repo because we have not yet had a fedora 31 branched
> compose finish. So, mirrormanager is pointing people to rawhide. This is
> likely the cause of all problems related to f31.
I think this is a major point. I could not find update with
fedora-repos-31-0.5 signed. Instead, there is 32-0.1 served both by f31
updates and rawhide repo. I think there must be first updated GPG keys
N, which increases just minor version, not a major one. Major version
should be increased only after branching. Unless I am mistaken, rawhide
served me 32-0.1 signed by key contained inside. Okay, I had rawhide
repo enabled. But even
$ dnf --repo=updates --releasever=31 upgrade fedora-gpg-keys
did not offer different version. What was worse, both were signed by the
same F32 key.

> 
> * Finally, updates are queued for f29/30/31 to add the f32 key. This
> shouldn't really be that big a deal unless you are running one of those
> and want to update to rawhide, or is there other cases here?
> 
> I think the first 2 items are the ones causing problems, and the third
> is not so urgent as them. Sure, we can add it to the schedule and do it
> in advance, but the other things are the things to really avoid next time.
> 
> kevin
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 

1. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-12c2cfd23a
2. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-7ac161b9d7
3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489628

-- 
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
email: pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx  PGP: 65C6C973

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux