Re: Why retire Python 2 packages and games that still work to end user ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> I've been seeing migrations like this for d decades, with major
> releases of many software tools. Preserving legacy versions, forever,
> is the precise opposite of "scalable".

What is more work: maintaining one compatibility package, or porting 
hundreds of packages (which are not getting ported upstream for whatever 
reason) to the new incompatible version?

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux