Re: Let's revisit the FTBFS policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Dne 15. 08. 19 v 13:36 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 12:42:02 PM
Subject: Re: Let's revisit the FTBFS policy

On 15. 08. 19 12:06, Vít Ondruch wrote:
At the end, if somebody cares about such cases, it should not be hard to
discover and act upon them, i.e. bugging the maintainer, fixing them,
taking over the maintenance etc.
This part is problematic. Because it requires human action that can be seen
as
toxic by some.
Only if they're present to notice. In the end, they're late and it was fixed for them, or at least someone cares for their work, so they should be... grateful?

 > According to compose report from 20190811 [1], I guess it was ~570
 > packages. How many of them had associated FTBFS BZs in "ASSIGNED" state
 > and for which version of Fedora? This would be interesting statistics to
 > know. My guess is that it was 100 BZs at most, but probably much lower
 > number.

"for which version of Fedora" doesn't apply really. Most of the bugs were
just
"rawhide" since the latest rawhide -> 30 only happened partially.

The status data should be visible in Bugzilla, however no idea how to query
them
grammatically:

  - get CLOSED EOL bugzillas blocking the F30FTBFS tracker
This should be it:
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1674516&bug_id_type=anddependson&bug_status=CLOSED&list_id=10414793&query_format=advanced&resolution=EOL


So this lists 656 components for F30.

There are 16 components for F29:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1602938&bug_id_type=anddependson&bug_status=CLOSED&list_id=10415022&query_format=advanced&resolution=EOL




  - fetch their previous state
          (this is visible in the bug, but no idea how to query it)
Sorry, I have no idea for this one.


Ah, you beat me to do this:


F30 - 41 components:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1674516&bug_id_type=anddependson&bug_status=CLOSED&f1=bug_status&f2=OP&list_id=10414961&o1=changedfrom&query_format=advanced&resolution=EOL&v1=ASSIGNED


F29 - 2 components:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1602938&bug_id_type=anddependson&bug_status=CLOSED&f1=bug_status&f2=OP&list_id=10414961&o1=changedfrom&query_format=advanced&resolution=EOL&v1=ASSIGNED


F28 - 25 components: 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1555378&bug_id_type=anddependson&bug_status=CLOSED&f1=bug_status&f2=OP&list_id=10414961&o1=changedfrom&query_format=advanced&resolution=EOL&v1=ASSIGNED


Interestingly enough, some people who complains the most about the process are too busy to even switch the component to assigned ...


Vít

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux