On 7/31/19 12:01 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733602 > > One of the suggestions there is to "drop the arch." I.e. i686. > > If that ends up being the solution that pretty much would force me to drop > the arch too for glusterfs. (GlusterFS has a bit of plumbing around opening > ports in the firewall. It might just fail — silently or not so silently. > It's hard to know, nobody has tested it. > > I suspect dropping the arch might cause some amount of heartache in some > circles. > > OTOH, I haven't paid close enough attention to really understand what it > means to stop building i686 kernels. Does that mean no Fedora distribution > for i686 hardware? Does it even make sense to keep building glusterfs for > i686? I would drop the kernel dependency. It doesn't make sense already in some contexts (containers) and this is a Fedora package for Fedora users, so I think anyone who would install it would have a kernel, and if it's a supported Fedora release it would be larger than 4.18.0. Dropping i686 kernels just means there's no more media/images for i686, but we keep building everything in case we need it for multilib. I would assume now you should keep building things, and if there's a change down the road to limit the scope of i686 more you could drop it when/if it makes sense then. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
