On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 15:10, Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 1:31 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 7/25/19 11:05 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> hmmm. from the root.log
>
> DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Error:
> DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Problem: conflicting requests
> DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides kernel >= 4.18.0
> needed by firewalld-0.6.4-1.fc31.noarch
>
> how to deal with this? Wait for a new firewalld package?
Yep.
I have asked the 'dropping i686 kernels' change owner to file bugs on
these packages.
Looks like:
firewalld-0.7.1-1.fc31.src.rpmOne of the suggestions there is to "drop the arch." I.e. i686.If that ends up being the solution that pretty much would force me to drop the arch too for glusterfs. (GlusterFS has a bit of plumbing around opening ports in the firewall. It might just fail — silently or not so silently. It's hard to know, nobody has tested it.I suspect dropping the arch might cause some amount of heartache in some circles.OTOH, I haven't paid close enough attention to really understand what it means to stop building i686 kernels. Does that mean no Fedora distribution for i686 hardware? Does it even make sense to keep building glusterfs for i686?
Yes it means no Fedora distribution for i686 for F31+. I would say that unless your binary is needed for multi-arch, then it also does not make sense to make it for i686 at this point.
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
