On 24/07/2019 13:32, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:02 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 24. 07. 19 10:24, Tom Hughes wrote:
That said, having to go round adding a mega ugly config file
to every package that looks an awful lot like an internal braindump
from some system doesn't really inspire confidence, or make for an
easy way of opting in.
This. The gating.yaml file is terrible.
Do either of you have a better suggestion?
Well more ordinary YAML would be a good start.
I mean I literally had to go and try and read the YAML spec
to try and work out what it was doing and let me tell you, for
something that I had always thought was a simple format it has
a very long and hard to read spec...
So a single document would be good, and get rid of the tags
which I assume are the result of serialising objects with
those name.
The very.long.reverse.domain.test.names are not ideal.
Then there's decision_context which apparently does nothing
but has to be there.
Is there any rule type other than PassingTestCaseRule?
If not then what's wrong with:
---
rules:
fedora-*:
- dist.abicheck
- dist.rpmlint
fedora-30:
- my.special.text
or something equally simple, which just a list of tests
to require for each version.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (tom@xxxxxxxxxx)
http://compton.nu/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
